Herweijer, C., Ranger, N. and Ward, R.E. (2009) “Climate Change Adaptation: Threats and Opportunities for the Insurance Industry,” The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance- Issues and Practice 34: 360-380. 5. Both parties feel safe as long as they have consensual interests. It eliminates the feeling of insecurity among new buyers at all times. 3. Both parties feel safe for a longer period of time warranty. A number of authors have shown that the insurance industry itself can benefit from greater action to encourage risk reduction. Unfettered climate change and an increased concentration of insured assets in exposed regions are expected to increase the correlation and volatility of damage to a level that could have a profound impact on the insurability of natural hazards and the affordability of insurance. Footnote 7 The resulting public and political discontent could have repercussions on other industries, as has been observed in the Florida insurance market.
The formula for calculating the premium of an insurance contract can be called Eq. (1) the annual premium, E (C) the expected annual value of the damages, E (X) the expected annual value of the expenses and α. K represents the capital charge, K being the capital requirement and α the annual return on investment demanded by the shareholders. Multi-year contracts could promote a higher level of insurance coverage across society, with benefits for individuals and society as a whole. In some markets, for example, policyholders tend to terminate or not renew contracts in the absence of losses, which can make them and society more exposed when an event occurs. 2. It eliminates the unpleasant surprises of the increase in purchase prices. Prices are set in advance if the supplier is likely to increase its expensive price. Jaffee, D., Kunreuther, H.
and Michel-Kerjan, E. (2008) Long terme insurance (LTI) for addressing catastrophek, BER Working Paper Series No. 14210, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Purely public insurance systems, such as the U.S. National Flood Insurance Program, may also have greater prospects for multi-year insurance. Footnote 35 Public insurance plans may have lower capital requirements, which could reduce the price gap compared to an annual contract. In addition, insolvency is less problematic, as public systems may raise additional capital at a reduced cost of taxation and therefore the risk of future liabilities (e.g. B long-term guarantees in uncertainty) poses a lesser problem. In addition, a purely public insurance system is not subject to competitive pricing forces and multi-year contracts could be offered by default. . .
.